Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siraj ur-rehman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Siraj ur-rehman[edit]

Siraj ur-rehman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can not nominate article per WP:BLPPROD, article includes no sources since it's inception. I was alerted to it's existence by ip user possible trying to remove unsourced content, but it's not helpful at all. Cannot find any reliable sources verifying it's notability. Bluefist talk 05:15, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The best path to notability is to verify that the Government of Saudi Arabia gave him an honorary PhD, honorary doctorates are rare, this is typically considered enough recognition under WP:PROF. -- GreenC 21:27, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 08:25, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.