Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siobhan Kelly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Siobhan Kelly[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite good faith search, unable to find sources indicating this actor meets GNG, ANYBIO, or ENT. ^Bongo_matic 14:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG (the sources in the article and elsewhere for example do not seem to represent SIGCOV in independent sources. The BelfastVibe source for example seems to relate to another person, and the subject here is only mentioned in passing. And the agency bio piece seems to be of the kind that all represented actors might have). Also doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR (roles, as listed in the linked IMDB entry for example, seem to be relatively minor). As per nom, a quick search doesn't return any other material SIGCOV examples. Guliolopez (talk) 15:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sourcing might be a small issue, but the TV and film credits - especially the high profile film - conveys notability. Sleeper4000 01:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Sleeper4000 (talk · contribs) has been blocked for vandalism. ^Bongo_matic 04:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She needs to have multiple prominent roles in notable production per WP:NACTOR, but the actress appear to have only minor roles or appear in minor productions. She needs more significant roles first before she can qualify for an article. Hzh (talk) 23:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to have significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Sleeper4000 appears to misunderstand the notability guidelines and requirements. --Bejnar (talk) 04:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.