Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinn Sage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sinn Sage[edit]

Sinn Sage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:BIO after a cursory check of Google News and Books Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: as per nom, failed to find wp:rs there are couple of Interviews like this [1] which really doesn't seem reliable, rest refs are mosty from Twitter. Dtt1Talk 15:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per nom --Devokewater (talk) 20:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, really nothing in either volume or coverage in GNG. Can't see her meeting criteria #2 or #3 of WP:NACTOR either. Britishfinance (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.