Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinister Attraction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sinister Attraction[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of Soul Crusher's NN industrial bands. The article contains only unreliable sources. No evidence of notable members or labels. Notability tagged since Sept 2020. Couldn't find anything reliable during a Google search. No evidence of notability. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Sources in the article are unreliable, primary, or non-substantial. A little here, but we need more. Incredibly little to be found about this band. Honestly, every single one of Soul Crusher's articles needs to be checked for notability - they were apparently autopatrolled before they got blocked, so much could have slipped through the cracks unnoticed. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious how many of Soul Crusher's trash are left. I hope there are not much. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 15:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.