Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singles (Maroon 5 album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 17:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Singles (Maroon 5 album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion, article created by blocked user User:Pistolplay, socking as User:Pistolplay3. Binksternet (talk) 01:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there a speedy tag to use for that? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 14:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but the speedy deletion template was removed by Pistolplay3. Binksternet (talk) 16:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - If one's the sock of the other, then basically their removal wouldn't be valid, (can't remove speedies of an article that person created) and the speedy could still be done... Sergecross73 msg me 18:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Tokyogirl79 would probably be interested in this discussion. She deleted two other articles by Pistolplay3, writing in the edit summary, "G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Pistolplay) in violation of ban or block". Binksternet (talk) 16:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect to Maroon 5 as this will attract some attention or otherwise should be moved to the band's article. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't understand why this is listed for deletion. It's clearly notable and had already gotten to number six in Japan last week. --Prosperosity (talk) 05:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.