Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Single-mindedness theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Single-mindedness theory[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable theory. It has only been referenced by the thoery's creator in one paper that was published in a non-peer reviewed book. Only other citation offered is to an article that predates the theory, and so cannot be used to establish notability of the theory. No external references to the theory. Previously prodded, prod removed by anonymous IP that wrote the bulk of the article. LK (talk) 03:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I cant find anything beyond thesaurus and dictionary refs. The article reads like a recipe for cake mix - half baked. No scientific credibility whatever. Mark^Dask 17:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Maybe the author can use Single-mindedness theory to rally enough support to keep this article. As it stands it reads poorly and has little to no notability to back it up.Golgofrinchian (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not a notable topic, if it's a topic at all--there is single-mindedness, sure, but that does not a theory make. Drmies (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.