Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Airlines Flight 317

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus herein for deletion. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Airlines Flight 317[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failure to comply with WP:NOTABILITY. Decompressions occur all the time. Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As per WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents, accidents or incidents should only be included in aircraft articles if:

The accident was fatal to humans; or
The accident involved hull loss or serious damage to the aircraft or airport; or
The accident or incident resulted in changes to procedures, regulations or processes affecting airports, airlines or the aircraft industry.

This incident does not comply with the above requirements. Thus, I strongly agree for deletion.Tafeax (talk) 19:41, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The plane (which is still in service along the same route [1]) managed to get a day or two of media coverage for making an emergency landing in which no one was injured. The plane is not notable enough for an article and violates WP:NOTNEWS. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just a bad day at the office and not really notable. MilborneOne (talk) 11:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed. Not notable at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legoboyvdlp (talk • contribs) 13:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete per WP:SNOW: no deaths, no serious injuries. Loss of cabin pressure is sort of common (apologies to those who have fear of flying). Bearian (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable aviation incident....William 14:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.