Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin Klub Entertainment (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sin Klub Entertainment[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This record label clearly fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 04:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches at GNews, Google and Google Books yielded some passing mentions in reliable sources but no significant coverage. Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Gong show 04:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep As noted in the discussion a few weeks age, the article has some problems (promotional language) but the core assertions seem to be verifiable based in Google Book sources and the label seems to be somewhat significant. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You may want to take a closer look at those results. It's primarily fake POD books that reprint Wikipedia material, and a few directory listings that include every record label and do not indicate notability (the annual Songwriter's Market books). Buing included in Songwriter's Market is really no more notable than being included in the phone book. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tito☸Dutta 19:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a record label with seemingly no notable artists or releases. Appears to have been created by an account with a COI. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely Delete this article as it looks like some single purpose account here is doing some advertising for his/her label. I would suggest a block if the SPA keeps doing this bullshit. Even if it wasn't, its still not ready by any stretch of the imagination possible, in other words it WP:TOOSOON for this. Also delete per the significant coverage problems mentioned above. 和DITOR E tails 03:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.