Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin Drome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sin Drome[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm having a hard time find reliably sourced information about this band, and the ones provided don't establish its notability per WP:BAND. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The page contains links to reliably sources.Soul Crusher (talk) 17:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the references in the article devote significant coverage to this band and none of them are independent and reliable. My search for coverage in reliable, independent sources came up empty, although I did find a lengthy Billboard magazine article about a jazz record label called "Sin-Drome". Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no real coverage at all in any of the sources - just passing mentions and listings, and Alex Kananowicz/Kane's own material (which even then doesn't say much about this band). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factor 42, which is the other half of the "split album" thing, and essentially the same people with the same poor sourcing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:BAND.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Another in a recent flood of articles on obscure industrial bands and albums created by veteran editor Soul Crusher, who should know how the notability guidelines work. This band has nothing in the media except brief announcements of their releases written by their record company. For more on Soul Crusher's unsupported and highly questionable misdeeds, see the incident investigation here. ––DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 22:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BAND. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 09:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.