Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simone Kliass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 16:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simone Kliass[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person - minor voice over credits are not enough to make him notable Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 13:10, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Likely delete - I'm not Brazilian or speak the language but I found what may be her IMDb and links at News but nothing that seems to have outstanding independent notability. @Victor Lopes: can probably translate some of the links but I'm sure he will also think it's non-notable. SwisterTwister talk 21:35, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The first source is her CV in a website of an association of people who work with their voices. The second one is a story about her in one of Brazil's largest newspapers, so it's a fine source. The third one is a project by students of an university in São Paulo, nothing too relevant encyclopedically speaking. The article would be better if it had one or two more major sources. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 19:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 19:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is good coverage here, and here too, some coverage here, and more here, overall looks like she meets the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 14:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable; very minor vocal roles; voice of the airport, really? Kierzek (talk) 18:43, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I feel as though Kliass is notable. The coverage with jcnet is substantial. Remember, we cannot be biased because of the lack of knowledge in Portuguese language and trends. As the English Wikipedia, we must remember this fact. Wiki92man (^Talk/_Stalk) 12:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - after a career of more than 20 years in commercials, and as a TV VJ and reporter, she may be now a minor celebrity in São Paulo, see here for a more comprehensive overview (it's a primary source, I know, but it's in English) Coverage has increased very much since she became the voice of São Paulo–Guarulhos International Airport. Just squeezes by WP:GNG. Kraxler (talk) 03:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.