Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon james morgan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simon james morgan[edit]

Actor with a few roles in notable shows, but not enough to meet WP:ENTERTAINER. Graymornings_(talk) 11:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per nom, and WP:*. --fvw * 11:58, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your views but disagree. I believe Simon James Morgan has sufficient deomonstratable success to warrant an article on Wikipedia.

He has starred in several notable movies including 2 of the very successful Chuckie franchise.

I look forward to your feedback. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Walesmerlin (talk • contribs) 12:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NO he shall not pass Wochende (talk) 17:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been able to figure out of any of his roles are leads or substantial supporting roles, but for whoever wants to figure it out: Here is a full list of his credits in all media. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:28, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Foxy Loxy ^Pounce! 23:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I haven't seen the Chucky films but I doubt that "Claudia's dad" is a major role. Looking at google and google news I don't see any critical commentary about him, just mentions of him in various parts. Juzhong (talk) 01:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete: I would suggest that the work be improved and more information, credit info., references and reasons for nobility added. A few lines always look bad. I would suggest that people who are doing entries, work with others to make a suitable paper before posting it for all to see. I wish the endeavour goodluck but at present it is weak in many areas. Royalhistorian (talk) 04:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.