Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Dishman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as silly vandalism. Capitalistroadster 03:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Dishman[edit]

Nonsense entry from the Lancaster University vandals. Jokestress 01:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. I think this should have been prodded. Carlo 01:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per all above. Royboy crashfan 01:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: G1 as patent nonsense; obviously about Adolf Hitler. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at light speed. Patent nonsense. Bucketsofg 01:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, for my money WP:CSD A7 unremarkable persons applies — there's not a single creditable claim to notability in the article. Oh, and deletion notices had been removed by 194.80.32.8. Sliggy 01:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
good candidate for speedy.--Firsfron 01:46, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speed delete as nonsense --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.