Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon "The Master" Chan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Simon "The Master" Chan[edit]
- Simon "The Master" Chan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-referenced article about a seemingly obscure Canadian personal trainer; the article may be a vanity piece. Does not meet WP:BIO. Warrah (talk) 21:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
References added to article. 18:38, 23 December 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.8.75 (talk)
- Delete: Nothing notable about this user, also just crossed the border to it being a vanity article (where did "The Master" nickname come from, no source from that neither it appears to be given by somebody else). Read the article and you will realise that user:Atlasottawa is him, therefore clearly a WP:COI WP:SPA user. Donnie Park (talk) 12:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unreferenced BLP, probably vanity. Gosox5555 (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete* Apparently someone tries to promote someone here. The sources used in the article are retrieved from Mister Chan's website or prove Johnny Chan plays poker. All of them lack neutrality. The whole influence of this man is doubtable. I see no notability in this article. --DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 02:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.