Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siltanen and Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Siltanen and Partners[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7 was declined with the rationale that: "maybe not "Big Brother" or "Get A Mac" but Apple ads tend to be somewhat iconic". While I agree that Apple ads do tend to get notoriety, I don't think all of them are significant enough to pass A7. However, regardless, searches turned up very little about this ad firm, most of it either listings or WP:ROUTINE coverage. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article on an advertising agency. I don't see the relevance of the Apple ad: notability is not inherited from work involving a firm's principal two years before establishing this firm. More relevant could be the firm's work indicated in the brief AdWeek piece, but I am not seeing more than passing mentions, nothing to indicate more than a firm going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG, SPAM, CORPDEPTH etc Borders on a PROD. South Nashua (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.