Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silpelit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 05:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silpelit[edit]

This article is irrelivant and contains no useful encyclopedic information. As such, it should be removed from Wikipedia permanently.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RabinicLawyer (talk • contribs)

Delete, fancruft. incog 01:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fancruft. The article is poorly written and already apart of Elfen Lied. This doesn't even discuss a minor character, this is a race that the minor character is a part of it. Even worse the original race Diclonius has been deleted from the Wikipedia leaving this article dangling in the wind. --TrollHistorian 01:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pointless, badly written fancruft. 204.191.190.187 01:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons already listed. DVD+ R/W 01:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lundse 10:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fancruft. --Ter e nc e Ong 13:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article actually answered a question of mine. About the poem of Mörike, not about the comic book. Silpelit may not be a household name, but it appears in one of the most reproduced poems of a classical german poet, where it is a bit of an enigma even for educated people. This article solves that problem for thes people. Azate 04:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Azate--The_stuart 19:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Answered some questions. If it is deleted, information should be put into Elfen Lied article somehow.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.117.76.187 (talk • contribs) .
Keep - Due to the use of the word prior to Elfen Lied, there is a valid claim for an article separate to EL, as per Azate. But yes, it could do with tidying. Probably should concentrate on the literary use (given there is no entry for Eduard auf dem Seil), with a link to a part of the EL article explaining the use inside EL?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Myfanwy (talk • contribs) .
Merge to both Eduard Mörike and Elfen Lied, leaving behind a disambiguation page. Melchoir 08:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, per Melchoir's reasoning. Folajimi 13:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.