Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silk Fever

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Silk Fever[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable comics villain. All of the current refs are published by Marvel, so all fail the independence test. A WP:BEFORE brings up more material published by Marvel (non-independent), blogs, wikia, and the like. Not finding a WP:GNG pass here. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing is all primary sources, no secondary sourcing at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is not enough coverage to meet the WP:GNG requirements, and I could not locate a viable redirect target to preserve this as a search term. Aoba47 (talk) 18:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Thunderbolts members per WP:ATD. BOZ (talk) 12:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to above, but this is a very low quality list. Does it pass LISTN? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 22:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not even notable within the fiction. The most significant thing she's done is be a member of villain groups, and I can't find any team articles, or even team rosters, that warrant her inclusion. Redirecting to one team over another would be arbitrary, and merging information about her to any of them would be undue. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG due to a complete lack of secondary sources, let alone sustained WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. Just a fancruft article. Newshunter12 (talk) 06:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.