Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikkimonline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by me. J Milburn 12:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sikkimonline[edit]

Unsourced, does not appear to be a notable company. —Gaff ^ταλκ 09:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) —Gaff ^ταλκ 09:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, just as I've done twice for this article already. Non-notable web forum, created by an editor with a clear conflict of interest. -- Longhair\^talk 09:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. No assertion of notability. On top of that, it clearly fails WP:WEB. There are no sources, just links to multiple sections of the website. After filtering the site in question and discounting Wiki-mirrors, I got 268 Ghits (the first, incidentally, being a spammers-paradise.com link). I'm also concerned with the lack of content: the site's AUP, for example, is hardly something that should be mentioned in an encyclopedic article and aside from that and a general description, there just isn't much, I'm afraid. I'm sure a lot of work has gone into this website[1], but it's just not ready for inclusion here yet. Sorry. Tagged as A7. --Seed 2.0 12:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.