Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigurd Wallén

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 01:09, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sigurd Wallén[edit]

Sigurd Wallén (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, along with redirect Sigurd Wallen – does not meet threshold for notability in any way. Quis separabit? 13:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep had the lead in 23 films, 2nd billing in 5, third billing in 10. Also directed 40 films, wrote 12, the article needs expanding as he had a large role in Swedish cinema Atlantic306 (talk) 00:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Strange nomination. If the problem is that the article sucks, why not just say so rather than making an obviously false claim about the subject? --Hegvald (talk) 00:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep - the only problem with this stub was a lack of sources which is easily fixed. I have added a reference to Nationalencyklopedin which is enough on its own to show notability, but of course the article needs more sources. They are easy to find. --bonadea contributions talk 09:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, ok, not the only problem perhaps. The claim to notability could be made more strongly. Will work on that tonight unless someone beats me to it. --bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.