Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Fin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 20:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sierra Fin[edit]

Article was speedily deleted (A7) back in September 2008. Still no major independent third party signs of notability. Almost all references relying on MySpace and blogs. No allmusic.com entry. Also there is a major Conflict of Interest issue in the article with edits by the bands management company GrandStreetMusic [1] JoannaMinogue (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This wasn't prodded? I bet this one will be uncontested. Tavix (talk) 02:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Still non-notable. The prod game is usually a waste of time, lets kill this one for good the old fashioned way. JBsupreme (talk) 07:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable band WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 07:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reliable sources covering the band. The references in the article are gig listing which don't establish notability, blog posts which aren't reliable sources, or a passing mention which doesn't establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BAND. Plastikspork (talk) 04:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.