Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyon Keoppel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shyon Keoppel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional. No substantial, in-depth, independent WP:RS to establish GNG. Additionally, user has engaged in what appears to be a pattern of Promotional, and like COI/Paid editing on non-notable pages. Theredproject (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I earlier took the easy way out with this article by marking it reviewed but adding a notability tag, which goes to say that I can't tell in this case. It's definitely on the border, but it's unclear to me on which side. I will therefore refrain from jumping either way here. But it is worth noting that the editor very clearly is doing undeclared paid promotional work with these pieces, and that some general reaction may be due on that account. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.

Thank you Elimidae for the opportunity the article Shyon Keoppel has more than five secondary sources citations and Wikipedia requires at least three secondary sources to write an article. Shyon keoppel is notable and I'm not connected to him. I don't even live in the United States, so stop assuming (Ziggy 2milli (talk) 21:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)).[reply]

User:CAPTAIN RAJU|CAPTAIN RAJU]]^(T) 15:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Violates WP:PROMO. Sources are not strong enough to establish WP:GNG and looks like it was written for marketing/PR purposes. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not Linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - article has been moved to Draft:Shyon Keoppel by its creator. ansh 666 20:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.