Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyla Jennings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shyla Jennings[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two lines and a list of awards does not pass ENT and GNG. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:11, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:11, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:11, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:15, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:15, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:19, 11 May 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per point #3 in WP:ENT, pornography is a "field of entertainment", which she indeed made "prolific or innovative contributions to" by winning the awards. (SN: the fact that PORNBIO was apparently absorbed into WP:ENT and that winning (or even being nominated for) awards is no longer a requirement actually paves the way for more articles about pornographic actors. Maybe all the WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT porn haters who !voted to support removal in that RFC should have considered that.) Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 23:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Niche porn award categories like All-Girl Performer of the Year didn't pass the "well-known and significant industry award" PORNBIO test in recent AfD's even before PORNBIO was taken down. It is a stretch to call such a porn award win a unique contribution to field without independent reliable sources that attest to that. Both of us participated in that RFC. It wasn't about hating porn. It was about porn's lack of coverage by independent, reputable sources, not just the promotional ones. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Spartaz and Gene93k are right on target. Winning a non-notable award (the specific article was deleted) does not satisfy ANYBIO, and the claim regarding "contributions to the field" requires specific independent reliable sourcing, not an editor's disputable inference. The claim that industry awards demonstrate such contributions was expressly and implicitly rejected in multiple afds and drvs. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:ENT and WP:BASIC. Neither the performer nor her achievements have significant coverage by independent reliable sources. An independent search for RS coverage yields only brief mentions of the subject or quotes from the subject in articles focused on other topics. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.