Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuo Scott Liu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedied as nonsense by me. android79 15:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Shuo Scott Liu[edit]
Unverifiable (the link at bottom does endorse the content of the article). Hoax. Was tagged as prod, but that tag was removed. - Liberatore(T) 18:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as weird, unverifiable biography/hoax (no Google hits). (Also, note this AfD was blanked by an anonymous user.) -- Mithent 23:39, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I've tagged as speedy per a7 examples because claiming to be king of bulgaria is in fact not a credible claim of notability. clear hoax or WP:NFT.Obina 23:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry my bad, I ment Croatia. An anon user dropped the speedy tag with no comment so I have added it back. Obina 16:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as nonsense. Claiming to be king of Bulgaria would be a credible claim of notability for one guy, but the subject of this article is identified as a king of Croatia, which hasn't been a monarchy of its own since the subject's supposed birth in 1904. The link that was formerly at the bottom of the page identified the subject as a contemporary high school student who attended a scientific conference, which is probably accurate but not notable and not described in this article anyway. --Metropolitan90 04:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)Þ[reply]
- Speedy delete as {{nn-bio}}, borderling {{db-nonsense}}. Stifle 23:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The anon user has again dropped all the afd tags, and tagged the page as articles for promotion. Reverting again.Obina 13:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This was a good article... What was wrong with it?
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.