Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuang Sheng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems like there are legit doubts about whether the only source discussed here is reliable enough to satsify GNG criteria, and no other keep argument has been advanced. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shuang Sheng[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:NMUSIC Yoninah (talk) 00:40, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Yoninah (talk) 00:40, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Yoninah (talk) 00:40, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Yoninah (talk) 00:40, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing that suggests importance. Freetheangels (talk) 20:36, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of reliable sources that could help establish notability. Lorstaking (talk) 18:06, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Some of the sources appear to be reliable Chinese language sources (not the QQ one of course) - I just want to verify that WP:NOTE doesn't require English language sources. Simonm223 (talk) 18:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As an example, I'd suggest that Qiluwanbao probably constitutes a reliable source for Chinese entertainment content. Simonm223 (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- It is my understanding that RS can be in any language. Pinging Narutolovehinata5 to confirm that Qiluwanbao is RS. Yoninah (talk) 21:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - As I am not fluent in Chinese and I am not familiar with Chinese sources, I can't really be of much help here. With that said, I am unsure if Qiluwanbao is a reliable source: their website in the bottom has a message that translates to "Some of the content on this website comes from the Internet. If the media, company, company or individual claims intellectual property rights to this part, please call or write to us. ", implying that they merely aggregate stories from other websites. Secondly, said page appears to read like a tabloid article, so even is Qiluwanbao was reliable (not that the said article appears to use as its source a certain "China Network"), considering this is a BLP, I'm not sure if it can be used anyway. At the moment, I have no opinion on the other sources. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks @Narutolovehinata5: Mandarin is my third language and I'm not... great... at reading Chinese so I missed that on the Qiluwanbao source. That was the only notability question I had.
Delete This artist doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG standards, let alone WP:NMUSIC Simonm223 (talk) 14:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.