Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrivardhan Trivedi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shrivardhan Trivedi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject in question is only known for the program he anchors a crime show called Sansani and all the coverage relates to the show the subject in question does not pass WP:CREATIVE or WP:JOURNALIST in my opinion he fails WP:BIO.I would be glad to withdraw my nomination if someone can find a few secondary reliable sources on the subject and not for the show he anchors, I have tried to find sources but to no avail. FITINDIA 13:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources that could satisfy general notability guideline, all he got is passing mentions and appear to be a case of WP:BLP1E. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly passes WP:GNG. It is sort of a case of WP:BLP1E, but not entirely. The subject has won a few awards because of the same event, but winning these awards is another feat. I would have voted delete, if the section of "awards" didnt exist in reality. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In the light of recent events, taking my vote back. Neutral. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain how it passes GNG? There is no independent coverage ("Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it.) that addresses the topic directly and in detail in either Gnews or Gbooks. The awards are not notable and not even covered by third party sources also as entry in the Limca Book of Records is not, per se, a sign of notability, because of the book's criteria. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:The photograph is what intrigues me. Some of the articles that the author has created has photographs of the subject that were uploaded by him as his own work. Praveen Tiwari has a staged photograph. So does this article. Other articles also had photographs that were deleted earlier - Deletion discussion. All of these indicate a possible case of WP:COI, considering the declaration about his affiliations that the author has made on his page. I would however hold judgement and not vote since the author asked me on my talk page to look into the article when it was PRODed.Jupitus Smart 06:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jupitus Smart: One off the topic question, out of normal curiosity, are you from India? —usernamekiran(talk) 07:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes I am @Usernamekiran:. Jupitus Smart 07:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jupitus Smart: Exactly what I was thinking and I do strongly believe there is a COI and the author must disclose any conflict of interest he may have. I just notice Yavarai also asked Usernamekiran to look into the article when it was PRODed so his vote should be treated as WP:CANVAS. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:28, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS-1987: yes, he did ask me when the artcle was ProD'ed. But I first made sure the article was good, and only after that I removed ProD tag (one can see the time-difference). Even if I am summoned by anybody, my participation always remains impartial. :-) —usernamekiran(talk) 07:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernamekiran: That's alright but can you please answer my question that how it passes GNG and how the awards listed in the article are sufficient to support notability? Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 08:07, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to say. I probably won't be around, so I leave it to you all to consider a COI investigation after hearing what Yavarai has to say about this. Jupitus Smart 09:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear senior WP editors, several allegations have been leveled against me.WP:COI is one of them. In this regard I would like to submit that in spite of being new to this forum I am not a trainee journalist who has to satisfy his bosses or needs some extra bucks with WP activity . I am here only because of my new hobby. Professionally I have been a 'Group Input Editor' and 'Channel Head' with reputed media houses at Delhi. With God's grace certainly I don't have financial insecurity. But one thing is very much clear that yes I have acquaintance with lots of people in TV journalism but not with the people about whom I have made articles. I have not made even a single WP articles till date on any person who has notability issue. As a person and as WP contributor this is very insulting and demeaning to face such allegations. Earlier I was of the opinion that WP is really open for all but after seeing this grilling, leveling charges and overlooking the facts and sources cited, I have come to conclusion that WP has become very unwelcoming place for new comers. I apologize if my words hurt anybody. This is much I have to say. Now finally it's up to you whether you keep Shrivardhan Trivedi on WP or vote for it's deletion. This is my last submission regarding article in question. Regards--Yavarai (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Yavarai[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event; maybe later. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 21:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.