Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrisudharshannathji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No userfy because the author, Devanshtrivedi (talk · contribs), is indef-blocked for copyvio. Sandstein 17:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shrisudharshannathji[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't source this looking at a variety of spellings. It isn't mentioned in our article on Bhopal where it is supposed to be. I raised this on the related Wikiproject and got no response. Dougweller (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No references found. It may be a non-notable temple. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy to User:Devanshtrivedi/Shrisudharshannathji. It could well be notable in local refs. -- Trevj (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 01:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There doesn't seem to be clear consensus on how this is written: "Shri Sudarshan Nath ji" or "Shri Sudarshan Nathji" are common and the article also uses "Shri Sudharshannath ji". --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or userfy - there's absolutely no information any where on this topic. There's a lot of specific information in the article, but no clue where it comes from or whether it's even relevant. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.