Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by RHaworth, CSD G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc[edit]

Shrine of the Irish Oak Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A church. It belongs to Universal Life Church, which is the "diploma mill" of churches. No inclination of nobility as refs about the church all come from Facebook, YouTube or church controlled sites. Creating editor is a member of the church and has removed Prods stating, "updated info and provided more verification links and resource". Bgwhite (talk) 05:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The church has been in legal existence since 2004, still in good standing with the state of Arkansas, and only chartered under the ULC in 2013,though it is still it own church and is in no way "controlled" by the ULC here are two non church sourced links showing that its legal http://www.sos.arkansas.gov/corps/search_corps.php?DETAIL=245505&corp_type_id=&corp_name=shrine+of+the+irish+oak&agent_search=&agent_city=&agent_state=&filing_number=&cmd= existence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolf Paradox (talkcontribs) 07:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has pretty specific requirements for notability, both in general and with regards to organizations such as churches. That it exists as a legal entity does not, by itself, establish notability. Why should this article exist? TechBear | Talk | Contributions

I am now of the opinion that this article should not have ever been written,and all info on the Irish Oak denomination of modern Paganism should have staid on witchvox, and other religious Neo pagan sites only, It was my mistake for writing/posting it here, But I would like to point out that: the issues of the article only popped up/became an issue when the info was added that we associate with the ULC, it then became a target there were no issues with it before that. but trying to make it right and get what is needed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolf Paradox (talkcontribs) 21:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete though if someone can come up with a merge target I might be OK with that. The only directly germane and reliable source is the state charter link, which confers no notability. Everything else seems to be a primary source with one (irrelevant) exception. Mangoe (talk) 13:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.