Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Munjaba Tample, Ukkadgaon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. But if @Kvng: you want the history for a move and expansion, just ping me. Star Mississippi 01:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shri Munjaba Tample, Ukkadgaon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article deprodded because it "may meet geoland". No reliable sources have been added and I was not able to find a single source that could verify if this location exists. Ben Azura (talk) 20:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I could not find any proof of notability the temple (Shri Munjaba Temple), which this page is about. The village seems to exist though, based on some sources: [1], [2], [3] Bendegúz Ács (talk) 22:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, definitely does not have “significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources” required per WP:NBUILDING. A possible hoax, as added Google Maps link does not return the temple and I can’t find any sources. ~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 23:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Ukkadgaon as WP:ATD and add sources found by Bendegúz Ács. The article already covers the village and the only information about the temple in the article is its name. ~Kvng (talk) 14:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. RangersRus (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.