Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrey Mallick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shrey Mallick[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It fails WP:NPOL. Meeting Leaders doesn't make anyone notable. He is son of Suman Kumar Mallick, the article is a sock work and a deep discussion is done over that. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 03:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, India, and Bihar. Misterrrrr (talk) 03:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, easily passes WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. The article has several references which independently discusses his political career, life and work in fair depth. Er Naanu (talk) 09:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How she passes Wikipedia:NPOL. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 05:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Er Naanu is joking. Please read and understand it. Thanks --- Misterrrrr (talk) 12:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Er Naanu is suspected of sockpuppetry at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suman Kumar Mallick. --Yamla (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Vote struck, blocked sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suman Kumar Mallick‎. --Yamla (talk) 16:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not here to offend anyone, and also the creator of the article. The subject is just a student leader and as far as i can see, not an elected representative to any house of state assembly or parliament of India. So don't pass WP:NPOL.Admantine123 (talk) 03:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NPOL. Unelected politicians are not notable. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 05:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - yeah, clearly meets the requirements of WP:NPOL and WP:GNG as far as I can see. NITA227 (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please write the criteria of Wikipedia:NPOL and Wikipedia:GNG which you think that Mallick meets. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 07:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- NITA227 is suspected of sockpuppetry at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suman Kumar Mallick. --Yamla (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Vote struck, blocked sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suman Kumar Mallick‎. --Yamla (talk) 16:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:NPOL. Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NPOL - unelected politician. Fails WP:GNG - coverage is short, syndicated and primary. Probably self-generated PR. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Student activism is not a level of political activity that confers an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, but the referencing isn't getting him over WP:GNG — it isn't substantive coverage or analysis about him, but just short blurbs quoting him as a provider of soundbite, which is not what we require to establish a person's notability. Bearcat (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NPOL like my PROD nomination. The position he is in does not confer WP:NPOL. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment failing NPOL is no basis for deletion - NPOL is a positive test, satisfying it confers presumed notability, not satisfying only indicates an absence of presumed notability. Furthermore, being unelected per se has no bearing on notability. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 07:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources to the article are regurgitated press releases or reiterations of the subject's tweets. The photos are uploaded by a user only concerned with images of the same subject. My own searches reveal no SIGCOV, independent reliable sourcing available. Fails the GNG. Willing to reconsider my !vote with alternate sourcing. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 08:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable politician. Valiaveetil (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no evidence of notability Almeida Fernando (talk) 09:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.