Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrek 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was All three articles speedy deleted as complete nonsense and hoaxes. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 14:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shrek 7[edit]

Unapologetic crystal-ball-ism, and as such, violates WP:NOT. This movie has not even been announced as a project; the current movie in the series is Shrek the Third. Since it doesn't exist yet in even a conceptual stage, there's no hope of satisfying WP:V. Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 20:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm at it, I'd also like to add Shrek 5 and Shrek 6 to the nomination, similar pages created by the same editor. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 20:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Shrek 4 was just announced within the last couple weeks. Articles such as Shrek 7, as well as Shrek 5 and Shrek 6 are nonsense. JPG-GR 20:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Shrek 5, Shrek 6, and Shrek 7 per nom. --Metropolitan90 20:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Shrek 7 is unofficial. A release is far from official"'. Delete as externally unverifiable and crystal balling per the article. This nomination may be extended to cover 5, 6, and any articles greater than Shrek 7. -- saberwyn 20:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Lijnema 20:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Shrek 5, Shrek 6, and Shrek 7 per nom. VegaDark 21:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no brainer WP:NOT violation. JGardner 21:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all, and go ahead and create Shrek 8, Shrek 9, Shrek 10, Shrek 11, and Shrek 12 as a possible release sometime around the time my great-grandkids are riding around on hoverbikes. That was a joke, of course. Delete. Wavy G 22:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above; the only reason Shrek 4 is around is that it's been announced. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 23:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While were at it why not add back the Rocky 45 movie as well ;-)Balloonman 23:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carpet bomb per nom. If you think it is bad now wait until some fan discovers this article and starts adding the usual speculation and original research. MartinDK 23:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete— Preceding unsigned comment added by Balloonman (talk • contribs)
Speedy Delete all three as nonsense. This never should have made it to AfD, as the original speedy tags were removed by the first author. Geoffrey Spear 00:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete all three. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball (If anybody actually can predict the future, just stick to next week's lotto numbers.) Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 00:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: As of yet, DreamWorks has said nothing about such productions. Wait patiently until, and if, they cross the bridge. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 00:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Crystal ballism to the max man! Whisp e ring 00:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 01:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Şρεęđў ḌèĽėɫë all three. PHDrillSergeant then goes and creates Rocky 43, Final Fantasy XXVXCDX, Mission:Impossible XXV and Devil May Cry 17. ~ PH DrillSergeant...and his couch...§ 02:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure there's any point in piling on at this point...but just in case - Delete.--TheOtherBob 03:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Seriously, this is still open? Robovski 05:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As above-K37 06:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, all nonsense, WP:NOT a crystal ball. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 12:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.