Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shreedhar Swami Maharaj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 14:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shreedhar Swami Maharaj[edit]

Bio of a non notable religous leader. Also, there are no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 12:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Google Books shows several references to him,[1] though a portion of the references might be about another with a similar name. Article needs serious work, but that's no reason for deletion. ~ priyanath ^talk 17:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I saw hits on Google and Google Books as well. The problem is that many people have this name, or a similiar one. Because of this, the Google hits arguement might not be a good idea for this specific discussion. Specifically, in this Google Books search, there are no reliable sources to back up any of the article's claims. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable with a common name. Wikidās ॐ 22:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, with the concession that the common name makes reliable sources difficult to find. If someone could find anything (I failed), I would much rather recommend keep (and perform a massive cleanup), but I haven't seen anything. Ford MF (talk) 19:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no verifiable notability. Mukadderat (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, WP:N, and WP:RS --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 16:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.