Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Showtek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Showtek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks primary sources to establish notability. Eeekster (talk) 04:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Were the subject of the Essential Mix, BBC Radio 1 [1] (see also [2] March 7 2009), hence satisfying WP:Band #11. There are also some sources, including one from the Belfast Telegraph [3], but mostly from Dutch or dance (or both) publications which I'm not equipped to judge. 86.44.35.226 (talk) 07:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 06:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per 86.44.35.226, who identified third-party reliable sources, which I'm sure is what Eeekster was looking for, not "primary sources." A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 06:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

reputable across a number of countries sources do exist, here is an australian source, [4]

Digmores (talk) 03:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.