Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shotbow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 03:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shotbow[edit]

Shotbow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Searched for independent reliable sources and found none. Just UGC and SELFSOURCE. The buzzfile source only demonstrates that the company exists, but does nothing for notability. Leijurv (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 20:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I also sent this on WP:DISCORD Leijurv (talk) 02:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. The only hits I could find of significance related to a 2014 change to Minecraft's EULA, where the server owner was quoted in a small handful of articles about monetization changes. No indepth coverage found of the server beyond those passing mentions. -- ferret (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the four June 2014 articles that mention Shotbow: 1 2 3 4. All are trivial mentions of the Shotbow server, and they are all quoting the same event. There is also another passing mention here in which Shotbow was again quoted speaking out against Mojang EULA enforcement. None of these are in depth coverage of the server though. Leijurv (talk) 20:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I also searched on Google Books and don't see significant coverage other than single paragraphs. Zakaria1978 (talk) 03:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.