Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoreline Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shoreline Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived, defunct record label. Most of the acts signed were red links. The only notable act with releases on the label was Nickelback. Zero sourcing found.

Prod declined with suggested merge to Koch Entertainment Canada, but I've found nothing confirming that Shoreline was ever actually a division of Koch (every search result for "Shoreline Records" + "Koch" just brings up Wikipedia mirrors or omits the "Koch" part entirely). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ontario. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of significant coverage from independent and reliable Sources. Brayan ocaner (talk) 09:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.