Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting Action Sports

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shooting Action Sports[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a how-to book, referenced only to its own publisher and Amazon.com with no evidence of reliable source coverage about it in media shown at all. As always, every book does not get an automatic free pass over our notability standards for books just because it's available on Amazon -- it has to be the subject of reliable source coverage for an article to become earned. Also probable WP:COI, if you compare the creator's username TGFILMS to the name and occupation of the book's author. Bearcat (talk) 23:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No coverage exists. Mr. Magoo (talk) 00:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable, secondary source coverage: lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?). A lack of reviews on the publisher's page is usually a sign that there aren't any significant reviews to paraphrase. czar 04:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reliable, independent sources exist. Elliot321 (talk) 13:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.