Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sholem Aleichem College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Before renominating, a merger to Elsternwick, Victoria#Schools might be considered. So Why 15:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sholem Aleichem College[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded without rationale or improvement. Editor left a message at my talk page, User talk:Onel5969#Proposed deletion of Sholem Aleichem College, but did not respond to my request for sources to back up the claim. As it stands, non-notable primary school. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-notable elementary school. Perhaps there might be an appropriate merge target, but I don't know where. Alansohn (talk) 02:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have added rational and improved the page with various references. The school is only one of two known secular Jewish schools in the world that teach Yiddish. It may be the only secular Jewish primary school in the world. Jmlipton (talk) 01:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There is just sufficient available, ie WP:NEXIST, to write a more in-depth article. The article does need some balance here. Aoziwe (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.