Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shlomi Constantini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shlomi Constantini[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no actual evidence of notability. President of a major international society is notability , but the ones listed here are not major societies, but sub-specialty societies. DGG ( talk ) 22:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Just passes WP:Prof#C1 with an h-index of about 21. Presidencies will help. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Keep It's not often that I disagree with my colleague DGG (and then usually I am a bit more in favor of deletion than he is), but for once, WoS gives higher citation results than GS... I get a couple of thousand citations, seven articles with >100 to up to 256 citations, and an h-index of 26. It's a horrible "article", though, in dire need of cleanup. --Randykitty (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know of other cases too where GS gives a lower h-index than WoS. It's not uncommon. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.