Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivkrupanand Swami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shivkrupanand Swami[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid editing puff piece. Sources are inadequate: 1. No byline, not an RS, govt website. 2. 1 mention does not meet rs or gng 3. Not about him but an attempt by his foundation to break a record 4. I can't get 4 to open 5. Mention. Not about subject. A single line. No byline. Not clear RS and reads like a press release 6. Link goes to main page so no detail of subject 7. Report of a press conference. No evidence of independent commentary so cannot count to rs 8. Reprinted press release with absolutely no effort to pretend its an independent article. No bio data.

So a BLP that is entirely devoid of meaningful sources containing biographic data. A paid for article full of puffery is nowhere near the standard we require. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per Nom, sources aren't reliable, and mere mention to some other topic on RS won't make it pass GNG. Dtt1^Talk 15:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Spiderone 20:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- promotional article, delete per above all Thepilipalasgirl (talk) 23:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.