Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivin Narang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. With no prejudice against renomination; given the lack of further participation despite relistings (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shivin Narang[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:GNGACTOR. Period! Hatchens (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:NACTOR with leading roles in notable Indian national television series such as: Suvreen Guggal – Topper of The Year, Ek Veer Ki Ardaas...Veera, Internet Wala Love and Beyhadh 2 as confirmed in reliable sources in the article. The article is minimal and needs expansion but that is not a reason for deletion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article does not meet GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article doesn't have to meet the general notability guideline if it meets the specific notability guideline WP:NACTOR. That is established in point #1 in the lede at WP:N. The box on the right contains a link to WP:BIO, which houses WP:NACTOR. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb, is there a discussion board where we can ask about the approach to GNG and SNG, because different editors have different opinions as to how they should be treated for notability purposes? Dflaw4 (talk) 13:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dflaw4: Doubt there's a noticeboard. You might try Wikipedia talk:Notability, the talk page related to that guideline page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, thanks. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:11, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable TV actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The subject passes WP:NACTOR quite easily, in my opinion, with long-running roles in TV shows and a large fan base. There are also a lot of sources at "google news", including articles from The Hindustan and The Indian Express, such as this. I too think that the page should be worked on, not deleted. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
John Pack Lambert, you have voted twice. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment all articles must meet the general notability guidelines. They are general. Special guidelines only guide us on what is notable and in some cases they also point to things that do not meet inclusion criteria. The GNG must be met. This is more true of living people than of dead ones.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, qedk (t 愛 c) 06:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.