Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivangi Khedkar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 06:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shivangi Khedkar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems re-draftification is unnecessary. No notable roles, vanity press, WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS and no WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NACTOR. If someone could please find reliable sources to satisfy GNG or NACTOR kindly update this article. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete WP:NACTOR requires multiple notable films/series which is not the case here. --hroest 18:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper nom. Sonofstar (talk) 20:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The actress fulfills WP:NACTOR as she was the lead in all her three works given in her filmography section--117.193.136.237 (talk) 16:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Only one mainstream acting credit; doesn't seem to satisfy NACTOR yet. Sunshine1191 (talk) 03:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.