Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirli Kopelman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:BIODELETE, part of our WP:DELETION policy, is relevant. In any case, there is consensus here that the subject is relatively unknown and their request for deletion should be honoured. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shirli Kopelman[edit]

Shirli Kopelman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kopelman emailed me asking for her article to be deleted due to privacy concerns. I am bringing it to AfD due to her passing the notability criteria. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per subject's request. She appears to meet the basic bar for notability for an author, but isn't particularly famous. pburka (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as she clearly meets WP:NACADEMIC. As far as I know, there is no such thing as deleting per request of the subject of the article, let alone a request not made by the person themselves; someone more experienced could help here. It is safest if you ask her the passages she wants deleted, and delete them if (hopefully) they are unsourced or sourced on a weakly reliable material. Walwal20 talkcontribs 15:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Regarding subject requests to delete a page, see WP:BIODEL, WP:BLPDEL and WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete at subject's request. No reason to keep. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete very clearly not so notable we should keep the article when the subject herself does not want an article here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no objections. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.