Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinji and Good Friends

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Neon Genesis Evangelion video games. Redirect preserves article history if there is future scope for a standalone article. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shinji and Good Friends[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible ATDs are merge/redirect to Neon Genesis Evangelion or Gainax. This is unreferenced and has been in CAT:NN for 12 years. I couldn't establish it meets notability. However, I only read English, so may have missed something. Boleyn (talk) 14:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Neon Genesis Evangelion video games#PC and console games -This group of minor games is actually already covered on that article, and basically has all of the information on them included already. I can't find any real coverage in reliable sources, and the article on these games in the Japanese Wikipedia is also completely unsourced, so I can't see any justification for keeping is as a separate article. Rorshacma (talk) 15:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Rorshacma, unless significant RS coverage can be found and stand-alone notability can be established (if these even exist, they are presumably Japanese print sources).--Alexandra^IDV 09:20, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.