Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shielding lotion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shielding lotion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear problems with promotional tone, lack of notability, and bloat. This topic warrants at most a mention in lotion. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Makes no claim of notability; fails WP:GNG; likely meets WP:CSD#G11, unambiguous advertising or promotion. - Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 22:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the current article is unacceptable and although my searches found results to confirm this product's existence, there were none for better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears a bit too promotional in nature with inherent problematic features to the content stylistic presentation. — Cirt (talk) 16:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.