Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherlock Holmes (2010 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nothing sourced to merge into proposed articles where a mention of the project based on the sourced referenced here (but not in the article itself) would be appropriate. Eluchil404 (talk) 11:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sherlock Holmes (2010 film)[edit]

Apparently fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when shooting can be reliably sourced to have already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails notability per WP:NFF. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails film notability guidelines; the movie must be in production in order for it to merit an article.--T B C ♣§♠ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 12:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFF; doesn't even have a confirmed title yet. Cliff smith ^talk 17:17, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Film appears to have been announced, but nothing more. Fails WP:NFF. PC78 (talk) 18:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 18:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep or merge informations to Sacha Baron Cohen, Will Ferrell, and/or Etan Cohen. Although the brief article cites only one source... a blog, I found plenty at Variety, New York Daily News, Cinematical, Always Watching, SlashFilm, and FirstShowing, among others. Seems notable enough to consider having the information on Wiki. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – The sources cited by User:MichaelQSchmidt establish WP:GNG notability at least for the casting of this film. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)}

As per WP:N, the issue is not the notability of the content, but the notability of a separate article. Hence WP:NFF. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 02:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.