Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherine Wells

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Claims that the subject satisfies the GNG don't seem to be satisfactorily supported. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sherine Wells[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, holding a national record doesn't pass WP:NTRACK, and without that, this athlete doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. Was de-prodded without explanation. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:23, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I concur, simply nothing for actual sports notability and all that exists is the national claim. SwisterTwister talk 05:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG. Covered in at least [1] [2] [3], not including other trivial mentions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 01:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 01:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 01:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's clear to see she passes WP:GNG which overides WP:NTRACK. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 13:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, to be honest I thought I recognised the name, but unfortunately can't find evidence of Wells competing at the highest international level. He national record is as part of a relay team, so doesn't meet WP:NTRACK. The news coverage cited above is merely reports of competition results, there is no evidence of signifant attention to Wells as an individual, therefore she certainly doesn't meet WP:GNG either. Sionk (talk) 22:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - not sure how above editors are coming up with passing GNG - current sourcing does not show that, and the 3 sources listed above, one is a nice article (The Star piece), the other is a press release, and the third is a brief mention. This could be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.