Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheppard Solomon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 00:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sheppard Solomon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have a suspicion this was written by the promoter. It has had no references since 2010 and I find nothing significant when I did a google search. ツStacey (talk) 21:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I found (and added) one substantial source, a 2009 profile in The Jerusalem Post (available on HighBeam), also published in somewhat different form in The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. He is a successful songwriter, and searches under the name "Shep Solomon" turn up a variety of briefer mentions in music publications and elsewhere, such as [1][2][3][4]. There also appears to be another, more substantial profile of him in the June 7, 2003 Music Week [5], but it's available only via the HighBeam Business library, which isn't included in HighBeam's Wikipedia access program, so I can't read the whole thing. This would benefit from further scrutiny. --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at best for now and Draft later if needed, searches found nothing better and everything here is still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 21:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Couldn't find information on sufficiently reliable sources. Has co-written several notable songs but over all not notable enough to warrant their own page. Doesn't meet WP:COMPOSER. DeviantAttitude (talk) 14:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The coverage of him in depth by both The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles and Music Week in particular seem to make him pass above the notability bar, beyond just the slight mentions in numerous other publications. His association with various successful songs appear, at least, significant if not strictly notable. The article may need to be fundamentally re-written, yes, but that's not a particularly good reason for deletion. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – He has had some notable works. CLCStudent (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 18:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.