Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shellanoo Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shellanoo Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has serious neutrality issues and while there is sourcing, it would require a substantial rewrite in order to be encyclopedic. As it stands right now, it only highlights the accomplishments of the company. WP:TNT seems like the best option for this. Also, the 82.81.x, 79.182.x, and 2.53.x IPs are all on the same source range associated with Xparta (talk · contribs) (based on behavioral evidence). These socks have been very active at the related article for O. D. Kobo. (Relevant SPI here) -- Dane ^talk 21:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO and WP:TNT. Largely concur with nom that this is not salvageable. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's literally no lifelines here since it's all blatant advertising hence policy never negotiates with it. SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above; fails WP:Corp and is a promo piece. Kierzek (talk) 15:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.