Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Mahmud Suleiman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 06:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Mahmud Suleiman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article along with Jamia Masjid Kibra and Madarastul Falaah Kibra. In my searching, the person (Sheikh Mahmud Suleiman) appears to exist, but the only mentions I can find of him are in blogs. I am unable to find anything on the mosque and the institution. The two external links over the three articles are 1) a broken url and 2) an unrelated article about Somalia. In addition, the images are a building in Bangladesh and a holy site in Mecca, whereas the articles are in Kenya. Unless more exists in Swahili sources that I am unaware of, these three article are unverifiable, verging on hoaxes. Note: All three were created by the same editor, and are the entirety of his contributions to Wikipedia. Chris857 (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:54, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:54, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subject not only fails WP:Notability (people) but also WP:GNG. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same for the mosques, by the way. And why does one of them have a picture of the grand mosque in Mecca? Is this some kind of a joke page? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:07, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Possibly a hoax. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 19:50, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Inadequate sources to establish notability or anything in regards to subject. Jason from nyc (talk) 01:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.