Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheiff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete' ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 03:18, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sheiff[edit]

Unverifiable neologism. Probably made up. DJ Clayworth 01:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I get zero hits. --BillC 01:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stupid delete crap. 71.212.87.103 01:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Royboy crashfan 01:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, nice. T K E 04:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - Delete stupid crap 71.212.87.103 01:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC), further it is obviously vanity from either some underage brat or his friends. It is mis-spelled and there is no way this "word" has any meaning outside of some small town hillbilly school. There, is that enough reason?71.212.87.103 01:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Just make sure to bold the right word. :) The way you worded your vote was rather misleading. Royboy crashfan 01:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WINAD, WP:NEO, WP:NFT, and WP:NOT. Royboy crashfan 01:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete patent nonsense. Bucketsofg 02:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense Gflor e s^Talk 03:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sheriff (plausible misspelling.) This is nn. Grand master ka 03:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --Metropolitan90 06:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:11, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not for slang you and your school buddies made up. --Icarus 07:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable neologism, fails WP:NFT. JIP | Talk 08:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Good god......I'm agreeing with an anon! ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 15:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 17:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it's nonsence, not nonsense. --HolyRomanEmperor 17:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it's very much nonsense, not nonsence. JIP | Talk 19:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Patent nonsence. --HolyRomanEmperor 17:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I weep for the future. ... discospinster 19:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete per obvious reasons.--Wizardman 23:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Icarus Nick Catalano _contrib ^talk 23:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
???? I don't even understand what the article is trying to say. Delete Heilme 23:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nonsense. ProhibitOnions 14:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.