Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheffield International Venues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield International Venues[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written entirely like an advert and much of the content belongs on the pages of the relevant venues. No sources and practically no useful content about the organisation itself. SheffGruff (talk) 17:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

concur, this is an ad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilyharris (talk • contribs) 18:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep -- Horribly ADVERT, and it is only managing venues, not owning them. However even managing assets worth £250M is surely notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's a significant organisation. However, the article as it stands is like an advert in parts and poorly written in other parts ("over the past 10 years" is meaningless). If kept, major rewrite needed to pare to the bone. Emeraude (talk) 13:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.