Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/She (Zayn song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mind of Mine. ♠PMC(talk) 23:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She (Zayn song)[edit]

She (Zayn song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article for deletion because it shows a lack of notability per WP:NSONGS. Its coverage comes from only album reviews. Some very low chart entries. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Mind of Mine--Cracking onto the top 100 of five charts is not very low, I think. Regardless, it does not mean that this song has received notable coverage on its own. Per NSONGS, since there is not enough material for a detailed article, this should be redirected to the article of the album. (talk) 04:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Mind of Mine - Even the barely-two lines of content that are in this article come from album reviews.--NØ 14:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Mind of Mine per nom. Coverage not outside album reviews, and nothing significant as MaranoFan points out; any discussion about the song can be easily covered under the album article so there is no need for a standalone article. --Ashleyyoursmile! 19:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Mind of Mine as per nom. Citterz (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.